Question

Are Christians considered mushrik (polytheists) in the Qur’anic perspective? If they associate partners with God, such as in the concept of the Trinity or in calling Jesus the “Son of God,” does that not qualify them as polytheists in Islam? Why, then, is Christianity clubbed with the monotheistic traditions?

Answer

The question of whether Christians are to be classified as mushrik (polytheists) in the Qur’anic sense is both linguistically and theologically nuanced. A careful analysis of Qur’anic usage, combined with an appreciation of how the Qur’an employs legal and theological terminology, helps clarify the distinction between committing an act of shirk (associating partners with God) and being designated as a mushrik.

The classical Islamic position often rests on the belief that shirk, in its doctrinal and ritual manifestations, is an unpardonable sin, as declared in the Qur’an:

“God shall not forgive associating partners with Him. Lesser than this, however, He will forgive [according to His law whomsoever He wants.”

Qur’ān 4:116

There is no dispute among Muslims that Christian doctrines such as the Trinity, the divinity of Christ (pbuh), and in some cases Mary (pbuh) or intercessory practices fall under the rubric of shirk according to the Islamic theological framework. However, the real question is whether such theological errors suffice to classify Christians as mushrikūn in the Qur’anic usage of the term.

The Qur’anic Lexicon: Mushrik as a Term

The Qur’anic term al-mushrikūn is overwhelmingly employed in a specific context. As observed by scholars such as Javed Ahmad Ghamidi, the Qur’an uses the term al-mushrikūn primarily with the definite article ال (lam ʿahd) to refer to a historically specific group: the Arabian polytheists from among the Ishmaelites who directly opposed the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and adhered to shirk as a conscious, inherited religious system.

The distinction lies not merely in the act of shirk, but in the status of adopting shirk as a formal religious identity. The Qur’an highlights this group’s adherence to polytheism as their recognised religion, one that they proudly maintained and defended—even while acknowledging God’s sovereignty in certain domains:

“If you ask them: “Who has created the heavens and the earth?” they shall definitely say: “God.” [51] Say: Then have you thought that if God wants to inflict some harm on me, then those [female idols] which you call upon besides God, can they ward off the harm inflicted by Him? Or if God wants to grant me a favour, can they be ones who impede that favour? Say: God is sufficient for me. Those who trust, trust Him.’”

Qur’ān 39:38

Despite this acknowledgement, these Arab polytheists assigned divine roles to idols and beings whom they considered intermediaries or associates of God, thus formally establishing shirk as their public religious posture. Accordingly, the Qur’an repeatedly refers to them using the definite term al-mushrikūn.

Why Are Christians Not Called Mushrikūn in the Qur’an?

While the Qur’an categorically condemns theological deviations found in Christianity, such as deifying Jesus (5:72), the Trinity (4:171), and taking their monks as lords besides God (9:31), it never uses the term al-mushrikūn or mushrikīn to describe them.

Instead, it continues to refer to Christians and Jews as ahl al-kitāb (People of the Book), preserving their formal identification as followers of monotheistic scripture. The Qur’an even distinguishes between ahl al-kitāb and al-mushrikūn explicitly:

“Those among the People of the Book and the polytheists who have denied [the Qur’ān] shall not desist from their stubbornness until [according to their wish] there comes to them a clear sign…”

Qur’ān 98:1

“Whether they are the People of the Book or the Idolaters, those among them who have disbelieved do not want that any blessings be sent down to you from your Lord.”

Qur’ān 2:105

These verses establish a categorical linguistic distinction between the two groups. Even though the Qur’an acknowledges that shirk has entered into the beliefs and practices of some People of the Book, it refrains from calling them mushrikūn—a term which, as explained, had become contextually tied to the idolatrous religion of the pagan Arabs.

Acts of Shirk vs. Religious Identity

One can commit acts of shirk and yet not be called a mushrik in the Qur’anic technical sense. A person or group is only addressed as mushrik when they have formally adopted shirk as their religion, recognising it as such and consciously persisting in it after being warned.

This distinction is supported by the Qur’anic treatment of Jews and Christians. Though their doctrines are criticised for containing elements of shirk, they are not denied their formal claim to tawḥīd (monotheism). The Qur’an even invites them to return to the purest form of monotheism:

“Tell them: O People of the Book! Come to what is common between you and us: that we should worship none but God, associate nothing with Him…”

Qur’ān 3:64

Such an invitation would be incoherent if Christians were already considered mushrikūn in the same sense as the Arab pagans, who were declared outside the pale of monotheistic faith and were given a clear ultimatum in Sūrat al-Tawbah.

Implications for Legal and Social Rulings

This linguistic and theological precision has significant implications. For example:

• The Qur’an prohibits marriage with mushrikāt (polytheist women) in Sūrat al-Baqarah (2:221), but explicitly permits marriage with chaste women from among ahl al-kitāb (5:5).
• Similarly, meat slaughtered by ahl al-kitāb in compliance with the prophetic tradition is made lawful, whereas there is no such provision for the polytheists.
• The Qur’an restricts polytheists from approaching al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (9:28), a ruling historically understood to target the pagan Arabs.

These distinctions would be inconsistent if all theological deviations were treated identically under the term shirk without qualification.

To summarise:

• Christians are guilty of certain theological deviations that fall within the ambit of shirk from the Islamic viewpoint.
• However, the Qur’an does not label them mushrikūn, nor does it group them with the Arab polytheists in its legal discourse.
• The term mushrik in the Qur’an, especially when accompanied by the definite article (al), refers primarily to a specific group: the polytheistic opponents of the Prophet Muhammad from among the Arabs.
• As such, while Christians may be murtakibīn al-shirk (committers of shirk), they are not mushrikūn in the Qur’anic technical sense.

This careful distinction safeguards both theological accuracy and Qur’anic integrity. It cautions against the indiscriminate use of terms that carry significant doctrinal and legal implications in Islamic discourse.

I hope this helps.

Mushfiq Sultan

Favorite